Archive | News Things RSS feed for this section

What Jonah Lehrer Tells Us About Today’s Journalism Industry

2 Aug

This has not been the greatest summer for journalism.

First college reporter extraordinaire Liane Membis was fired from her Wall Street Journal internship for inventing quotes. Then an NPR intern was caught writing about a Taliban execution that he didn’t actually witness. And now name-brand New Yorker journalist Jonah Lehrer has quit his post after getting caught self-plagiarizing and fabricating quotes.

Again, this has not been the greatest summer for journalism.

While this cannot possibly be the first time any journalist has committed these offenses, the case of guilty-as-charged Lehrer has confirmed one thing about today’s media industry: While you can still thrive, achieving stardom is now harder than ever and involves going above and beyond past demands placed on journalists.

Why’s that? Just think of how much technology has changed the field.

We now live in a time where more people than ever can access the same information online or away from their computers on a mobile. News now travels the world faster than it did in the past, and as a result it’s also very quickly replaced by the next event that comes along. Information appears quickly, fades quickly, but also accesses the largest audience it ever could before disappearing. Because of all that, more and more people, as you have heard, can and have taken to the net to report on the latest local, national, and international events of importance, adding in their own point of view to make the material their own.

Nowadays, just reporting the news isn’t enough. You’re expected to go beyond that if you want to distinguish yourself in a field of people who not only want to write, but have access to much of the same information you do. While it does help if you exceed them as a writer or if you have more actual sources to go off of, you’re still going to have to strive harder in a pool of ambitious people who possess more information on average than ever before.

And that’s just if you want to be very good. If you want to be a name brand or achieve some other equivalent level of stardom, you better start doing one of two things: Either present a relatively unique, never-been-explored perspective on your stories, or start becoming an idea man.

A lot of the time, you’re going to have to do both, which is exactly what Jonah Lehrer was striving to for.

There’s a recent Slate article by Josh Levin that faintly alludes to this demand. Levin has branded Lehrer as an idea man, one whose career is no longer that of a writer, but of a man whose very livelihood depends on how quickly he can come up with well-thought up societal commentaries. This has actually proven to be very accurate, as Lehrer’s fame resulted, for the most part, from his opinion posts and books. They’re what supposedly made him unique, distinguishable to media consumers everywhere.

Distinguishable in an increasingly competitive field. While becoming an idea man (or woman, if you prefer) has always allowed a writer or reporter to achieve greater fame and prestige than their peers, nowadays it’s almost a necessity.

And that necessity itself stacks on the pressure, especially if you can’t churn content out as often as you would like. Given the intense pressure that comes with the expectation to constantly produce the unique and new, it wouldn’t be surprising if more and more writers started taking desperate measures.

I do think Levin really hit the nail on the head with this one. It’s not hard to imagine that given all the expectations upon him and the demand to constantly search for new and improved ideas, Jonah Lehrer got desperate. If he didn’t keep up with it all, there was a good chance that Lehrer wouldn’t have been as acclaimed as he was prior to Michael Moynihan’s discovery that he had fabricated some Bob Dylan quotes, and the discovery that he had been re-posting previous material.

Lehrer understood that the reporter’s game had changed, and that the faster-than-ever flow of information and ideas meant that every journalist constantly needs to redefine and redesign themselves to match the need.

And to be honest, that’s actually kind of scary. It’s scary how what was once an industry based on slower-paced news reporting and column writing has now given way to a race to think of never-before read or seen things. It’s also scary to think about how one day when I’m out of UChicago, I’ll be thrust into all this.

Guess there’s no point worrying now, but perhaps I should start thinking things up. Might just help in the future.

Annie Reviews: The Dark Knight Rises

23 Jul

For the last week or two we’ve all been bombarded with review after review of The Dark Knight Rises, which only made us even more excited for when we’d finally sit down and watch Christopher Nolan bring his trilogy to an end. This is another review to add onto the thousands (actually, probably millions) of reviews, another personal perspective on Nolan’s third and final installment to his Batman trilogy.

And yet another review telling you that this movie is great. If not great because of some small flaws, then at least really, really good.

Gotham may have been in “peace time” for the last eight years, but you can feel the unrest that’s been bubbling and waiting to explode like a time bomb. Bruce Wayne has been a recluse since the events in The Dark Knight, Commissioner Gordon hesitatingly puts away his speech that would reveal the truth about white knight Harvey Dent, and despite all the smiling faces you can still spot unease in the eyes of everyone around.

But the underlying layer of unease and uncertainty never goes away, and it’s what takes away The Dark Knight Rises’ superhero movie feel while replacing it with this very real and human sense of fear. Fear of what the future brings, fear of its unpredictability. The kind of fear that we face every day where we wonder if everything that is going so right will one day go terribly wrong.

And this fragility is the link between every major player in the film. Once powerful and full of belief, Bruce Wayne has tumbled from the heights and spends his time hobbling around Wayne Manor with a cane, leaving us to wonder how he was ever the caped crusader. Christian Bale returns to successfully embody a Bruce Wayne so full of guilt and regret over Rachel Dawes’ death that we’re left only with remnants of the once-great Batman. Even Alfred and Lucien Fox, once the only reliable sources of stability amidst all the chaos, break down for the first time, giving us a first glimpse at the storm that is to come and reminding us of the strength and vulnerability that Michael Caine and Morgan Freeman bring to each role.

With a star-studded cast alongside Bale, Caine, and Freeman, Nolan recreates the conflict between hardened belief and fear that made its appearance here and there in Batman Begins, but sprung to life in The Dark Knight. The duality defines all interactions and relationships in Nolan’s universe, lending them an uncertainty that underscores the constant presence of Gotham’s breaking point. Gary Oldman and Joseph Gordon-Levitt shine in their roles as the washed-up Jim Gordon and new, optimistic John Blake, acting as foils for one another as Gotham plunges deeper into chaos. Both feed off of one another so dynamically that by the film’s end, you can witness some of Blake’s optimism in Gordon while the young detective has been brought down to earth by Gordon’s guidance and all questions he’s had to answer.

Then there is, of course, Tom Hardy’s Bane. While many critics have dismissed Hardy’s Bane as simply a brute, they miss the complexity the controls the villain’s thoughts and actions. Bane is not just a simple brute. His calculating mind, strong physique, and goal of stopping the seemingly evil Gotham with the city’s destruction directly opposes Heath Ledger’s Joker whose calculating yet insane mind, weaker physique, and seemingly purpose-less penchant for destruction makes him a completely different villain. Nolan has, essentially, succeeded in his goal of presenting Batman with a new villain who takes the caped crusader beyond his limits, but in ways that directly contrast with The Dark Knight‘s Joker.

You can see Nolan try to extend this contrast with the introduction of Marion Cotillard’s Miranda Tate and Anne Hathaway’s Selina Kyle. But where Nolan’s other characters are well-constructed, Tate and Kyle seem underdeveloped, making them less significant than Nolan originally intended them to be. While Hathaway fully embodies Catwoman’s feminine power and vulnerability as needed throughout the film, the absence of a seamless transition between the two reduces her portrayal of Selina Kyle into the typical femme fatale role so common among female superheroes. Cotillard, for her part, is terrific as Tate, but the absence of screentime allotted to the Wayne Enterprises executive interrupts her character arc, chopping it up into blocks that make Tate’s role in the plot hard to follow. Once it’s revealed that Tate is actually the long-lost Talia al Ghul, we’re surprised not so much because it’s a well-concealed twist, but more because it’s odd to let such a seemingly insignificant character suddenly take power over the terrifying Bane.

Aside from the plot holes in Tate’s story, a few other instances could have been played upon that would have dynamically changed some aspects of the film. The one that immediately comes to mind is the revelation to all of Gotham that Commissioner Gordon had, in fact, lied about the events surrounding Harvey Dent’s death. In Nolan’s universe, Harvey Dent had been immortalized after his death, with Gotham’s citizens so in love and grieved over his death that they passed a law under his name and created the annual Harvey Dent Day. So why such a limited reaction to the revelation that Gotham’s white knight was actually its nightmare? Not to mention that the lie had been told and concealed by one of Gotham’s most trusted men. Apart from Blake’s reaction, however, it seems as though Gordon never actually faces the consequences as even Blake eventually drops the subject and it fades from memory. The limited role of Gordon’s lie is somewhat unfortunate, as it would have been interesting to watch the relationship between the Commissioner and Gotham’s citizens change, and the changes’ effects on the fight against Bane.

Nevertheless, Nolan does offer us a relatively tight conclusion to a dark and twisted saga. Everyone seems to reconcile their ethics with their actions, allowing them to find a peaceful end to a long, devastating struggle with their uncertainties and fears. Nowhere is this most apparent than when Gotham is a mere few minutes away from destruction with Bruce Wayne at the helm of the Bat, flying out to the bay. Though the Batman’s imminent death threatens to put an end to Nolan’s iconic version of the hero, for once Bruce Wayne is no longer confined to Gotham and its tall dark buildings full of corruption and sin. Instead, he is flying with no boundaries, as if he is free despite the bomb hanging right beneath him.

With immense action sequences, dynamic storytelling, and a cast of largely engaging characters, Nolan transforms the classic battle between good versus evil into a reflection of our very fears and insecurities. While The Dark Knight Rises possesses the same characteristics as other superhero and action films, it forces us to look deeper and examine our own vulnerabilities and that of the world around us. Nolan’s juxtaposition of light versus dark, courage versus fear, and hope versus despair is what ultimately makes The Dark Knight a wholly satisfying end to a new Batman era, and a defining film for the superhero genre.

Thoughts and Prayers Out to Aurora

20 Jul

I initially intended to upload my own review of The Dark Knight Rises, but given the events in Aurora, CO that will be withheld for a few days.

What happened in Aurora was sick, terrible, and horrifying in every way. I can’t imagine the mindset of someone who can walk into a theater and indiscriminately open fire on innocent men, women, and children, even though events like this happen fairly frequently.

There will eventually need to be discussions about how we can prevent, or at least significantly hinder, individuals like James Holmes from getting their hands on weapons of any kind. I’m not sure what a good solution would be and won’t venture to propose one at the moment. However, something needs to be done, not just to prevent mass shootings like this. We need to also address the crimes involving firearms happening all over the country, but that you don’t usually notice because they happen so often and hence go uncovered.

For now, let’s just take the time to reflect on what happened. Just stop all the politicizing that’s going on and reflect. It really pains me to read through a lot of the comments I’ve been seeing on political blogs and news sites where people are accusing liberals/conservatives of using the shooting to their political advantage, accusing each other of being “killers” and so on so forth. That’s just disrespectful and not the point.

RIP Aurora shooting victims. Sending love to your family and friends.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 27 other followers